CAVEAT: We have tried very hard to make this data completely correct. However, because we have been known to make errors from time to time, and because the data sources are sometimes difficult to read and interpret, we do not guarantee the accuracy of the information on this page. Please email corrections, comments, or questions to us. Slight reformatting of the data are done to improve readability.
We believe in the open EXCHANGE of data. If you use data from this page, please send us some of yours in trade.
Use the back button on your web
page browser to return to the note you were reading.
Chester County, SC, Minutes of the County Court,
Order Book A, Page 157, October 2, 1786
(nicholasburgecourt1786a)
"The Reverend John Simpson Plaintiff
Against
} Upon An Attachment by Account
Nicholas
Burge
Defendant
Came the Plaintiff by Daniel Brown Gentleman his Attorney &
the Defendant failing to appear
On Motion Ordered that Judgment be entered entered by default & a Jury to Enquire of Damages at next Court
Catherine Steele being summoned & sworn as Garnishee in the above attachment declares she has nothing in her hands the property of the Defendant neither had she at the time of levying the said Attachmnt before or since all this the said Garnishee declared on the Holy Evangelist of Almighty God"
Order Book A, Page 228, January 1787
Reverend John Simpson vs Nicholas Burge, Attachment by Account, ...,
Continued
Order Book A, Page 249, July 1787
Reverend John Simpson vs Nicholas Burge, ..., Continued
Order Book A, Page 335, July 1788
Reverend John Simpson vs Nicholas Burge, Attachment In Case, ..., Continued
Order Book B, Page 4, October 1788
Reverend John Simpson vs Nicholas Burge, Attachment In Case, ..., Dismissed
Chester County, SC, Minutes of the Court of Common Pleas, October
2, 1786
(nicholasburgecourt1786b)
"The Reverend John Simpson vs Catherine Steal attachment same" (same
= Attachment Judgment by default & Writ of Enquiry)
"Catherine Steal being summoned to appear to declare what effects goods, rights, Credits & Chattels, she had the property of Burrell Burge declared that she had nothing of the said Deft. neither at the time of Leveying the said attachment nor before"
Nicholas Burge
Use the back button on your
web page browser to return to the note you were reading.
